This page addresses follow-up questions and additional information pertinent to our webinar
Combination Codes and the Patient Story.

** The coding information and guidance are valid at the time of publishing. Learners are encouraged to research
subsequent official guidance in the areas associated with the topic as they can change rapidly.

Q:  There’s an assumed cause and effect relationship between diabetes and peripheral artery disease, but what about coronary artery disease?  Do we make the link between CAD and diabetes?
A:  No.  Diabetes has a causal relationship with peripheral vascular disease.  There is no assumed relationship between diabetes and CAD and the conditions are coded separately.

Q:  Why would you not add a code for diabetic foot ulcer if the patient has diabetes, arteriosclerotic PVD, and a foot ulcer?  Don’t you need that code for specificity?
A:  When a patient has a foot ulcer with arteriosclerotic PVD and diabetes, multiple coding conventions apply.  Arteriosclerosis is a specific type of angiopathy.  ICD-10-CM assumes a cause and effect relationship between diabetes and angiopathy (arteriosclerosis).  ICD-10-CM also assumes a link between arteriosclerosis and the foot ulcer and tabular instructions direct the coder to use an additional code for non-pressure ulcer to describe the site and depth of the ulceration.  The combination of these codes provide all the detail to know that the patient has diabetes and an ulcer.  The code for diabetic foot ulcer does not provide any additional detail.

Q:  I am looking for guidance regarding coding CAD with HTN. I have been linking the 2 diagnoses: I25.10, Atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris and I11.9, Hypertensive heart disease without heart failure. Is this the correct way to code or should I use I25.10 & I10?
A:  CAD (I25.-) is not listed as one of the linked conditions under category I11 for hypertensive heart disease.  An assumed link is only made between hypertension and codes classified to I50.-, I51.4-, I51.7, I51.89, or I51.9.  See the includes notes under code I11 and coding guideline I.C.9.a.1. for further clarification.

Q:  Does peripheral neuropathy w/DM code to polyneuropathy?
A:  Peripheral neuropathy is damage to the nerves outside of the brain and spinal cord.  When multiple peripheral nerves are affected, it is referred to as polyneuropathy.  When the provider documents diabetic peripheral neuropathy, assign a code for unspecified diabetic neuropathy (e.g., E11.40, Type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, unspecified) unless the documentation indicates that multiple nerves were affected.  If, for example, the provider documented that a type 2 diabetic had peripheral neuropathy in both legs, code E11.42, Type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic polyneuropathy, would be assigned.

Kristi Pollard, RHIT, CCS, CPC, CIRCC, AHIMA-Approved ICD-10-CM/PCS Trainer

Kristi Pollard, RHIT, CCS, CPC, CIRCC, AHIMA-Approved ICD-10-CM/PCS Trainer

Senior Consultant

Kristi is a senior consultant with more than 20 years of industry experience. She develops and delivers training on ICD-10-CM/PCS and CPT, both virtually and in classroom settings.
Kristi also performs DRG and APC audits and is known for her vast knowledge on coding vascular interventional radiology procedures. Kristi has an extensive background in coding education and consulting and is a national speakers on topics related to ICD-10 and CPT coding as well as code-based reimbursement.

6 Comments

  1. Nate Schober

    Hello, Thank you for all the training. I was curious if you would code I11.9 with I50.9? Unspecified heart failure is included in the combo code I11.9. I50.9 (Unspecified Heart Failure) does not add additional specificity, and based on CC Q1 2017, Page 25 – COPD with unspecified asthma. and unspecified condition isn’t considered a specified type of that condition.

    Reply
    • kkluglein

      Hi Nate, We do not recommend assigning code I50.9 (Heart failure, unspecified) in addition to codes in categories I11 and I13 since it does not provide additional information and, as you mentioned, there is a Coding Clinic article that states unspecified is not a type.

      Reply
  2. Kelly Brokaw

    Great information and very well put together.

    Reply
  3. Gayle Oestreich

    It was very good and so helpful for clarifying how these diagnoses should be coded together.

    Reply
    • kkluglein

      Thank you Gayle! We are so glad you found this post helpful!

      Reply

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Share This

  • Exclusive New Customer Offer – 10% Off Your First Order!

    New here? Get 10% off your first order! Just enter your name and email, and your discount code will pop up instantly (and hit your inbox too). Start exploring today and grow your health information expertise!