Choosing the correct biopsy code can be a difficult task. Even determining whether a procedure is actually a biopsy at all can be a challenge. If you have seen your fair share of integumentary procedure notes, you know that getting to the correct code can be tough.
We commonly see notes that seem to indicate an excision was done, yet the note also states it was a biopsy. What code should you use?
Maybe you’ve seen a tangential biopsy note that also resembles a shave removal procedure. These are two different procedures that are represented by two different codes, so which one should you use?
Fortunately, the guidelines provide lots of instructions to point us in the right direction. Ask yourself, “What was the intent of the procedure?” Does it fit the CPT definition of a biopsy which is a “procedure to obtain tissue solely for diagnostic histopathologic examination….independently or was unrelated or distinct from other procedures/services provided at the time?” Or was it done for therapeutic reasons?
Going back to the scenario of a shave removal note that also looks a lot like a tangential biopsy note.
What was the intent? Was the lesion shaved and removed due to the lesion frequently catching on clothing, causing pain and bleeding? If so, this would lend itself to being a therapeutic procedure and a shave removal code would be appropriate. Or was it an odd-looking lesion that is biopsied utilizing a shave method and sent to pathology to determine a diagnosis? This would be a tangential biopsy.
Intent is just one thing to consider when it comes to determining the correct code to use. Want to dive a little deeper? Be sure to check out Haugen’s Biopsy Procedures Webinar where we will also discuss biopsy techniques and using depth to get to the right code.
Looking for additional information on this topic?

Shea Lunt, RHIA, CPC, CPMA, PMP
Director of Coding Quality & Compliance
Shea is a Director of Coding Quality & Compliance for The Haugen Consulting Group with 15 years of healthcare industry experience. Shea has experience working on the professional fee side of coding, auditing, education, and compliance serving coders and physicians. Shea has also served as a project lead for ICD-10-CM education initiatives and implementation of computer-assisted coding (CAC) projects. She earned a bachelor’s degree in health information management and a master’s degree in health services administration from the University of Kansas Medical Center in Kansas City, Kansas. Shea is a Registered Health Information Administrator (RHIA), Certified Professional Coder (CPC), Certified Professional Medical Auditor (CPMA), and a Project Management Professional (PMP).

0 Comments